• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:19:09 -0400

Tim Bray wrote:


> <fact>[A namespace name] is a URI.</fact>
> 
> <controversialAssertion>It *should* be an absolute URL, not
> a relative URL nor a URN.</controversialAssertion>
>  -Tim


I should rather say:

<fact expression="plain">A namespace name is a URI reference.</fact>

<fact expression="metaphor">A namespace name had better not be
a relative URL, or the Gods of W3C will frown upon the offender
and his children's children, yea unto the tenth edition.</fact>

<controversialAssertion>It can be an absolute URL, or an URN,
or an absolute URL with a fragment ID if you must.
</controversialAssertion>

-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: About namespaces
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• References:
  • RE: About namespaces
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: SV: Newbie
• Next by Date: RE: [ANN] Topologi Schematron Validator - free Windows tool doesSchematron+XML Schemas
• Previous by thread: RE: About namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: About namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread