• From: Peter Flynn <peter@s...>
• To: "Boyse, Jim" <Jim_Boyse@f...>,Timothy Heald <theald@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 01:01:52 +0100

On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Boyse, Jim wrote:
> 
> <clip>
> Yep, except the plural of schema is schemas. See me after class :-)
> </clip>
> 
> Shucks, I was hoping it was schemata.  Sort of like stigma, stigmata.

Nope, that's for Greek geeks :-) See the XML FAQ
(http://www.ucc.ie/xml/index.html#schemadtd). It's become an
English word now. And it's about time stigmas went the same way
(one could make an exception for religious use).

///Peter

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Newbie
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Newbie
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>

• References:
  • RE: Newbie
    • From: "Boyse, Jim" <Jim_Boyse@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Linking 1.0 and XML Base become W3C Recommendations
• Next by Date: Re: Define a root in a DTD
• Previous by thread: RE: Newbie
• Next by thread: RE: Newbie
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread