• From: Arthur Rother <rother@j...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 01:21:15 +0200

So why not XML BigBlueberry?

At 11:38 PM 6/21/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Jeff Rafter scripsit:
>
> > So why is it called XML Blueberry-- If there is a reasoning here, I missed
> > it-- but I have only been around for a little while...
>
>It's an arbitrary code name.  If we called it "XML 1.1" but we ended up
>deciding to flag the new-style documents in some other way, we'd look
>pretty stupid.

• References:
  • Why is it named "XML Blueberry"?
    • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@e...>
  • Re: Why is it named "XML Blueberry"?
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Blueberry
• Next by Date: Re: XML Blueberry
• Previous by thread: Re: Why is it named "XML Blueberry"?
• Next by thread: Re: XML Blueberry
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread