• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: Jesús Quiroga <jquiroga@p...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:55:18 -0400

Jesús Quiroga wrote:


> But this new and incompatible version should be christened XML 1.01, or
> any other version number that reflects the evolution of XML.
> 
> <?xml version='1.01'?> isn't that bad, and it implies exactly what you say.


The Core WG has not yet decided whether changing the version number or 
inventing some new kind of label is the Right Thing.

Comments are solicited.

-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Blueberry
    • From: Rob Lugt <roblugt@e...>
  • Re: XML Blueberry
    • From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>

• References:
  • XML Blueberry
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: XML Blueberry
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
  • Re: XML Blueberry
    • From: Jesús Quiroga <jquiroga@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Blueberry
• Next by Date: Fruits of the Forest
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Blueberry
• Next by thread: Re: XML Blueberry
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread