• From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• To: Rob Lugt <roblugt@e...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21:27:50 -0400

Rob Lugt wrote:

>  I propose a simple extension to SAX 2.0 in
> the guise of a new standard feature:
> http://xml.org/sax/features/absolutize-system-identifiers.  The default
> value could be "true" to maintain compatibility with existing systems.
> Applications could set it to "false" when they want a conforming catalog
> processor.
>

This is the most reasonable option. Having read the arguments back and
forth, I don't see the harm in passing both the base URI and relative URI
separated by a '/0' when this feature is set to false as is suggested by
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200106/msg00349.html. I can see
benefits to this approach.

-Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SAX 2.0 enhancement proposal
    • From: "David E. Cleary" <davec@p...>

• References:
  • SAX 2.0 enhancement proposal
    • From: Rob Lugt <roblugt@e...>

• Prev by Date: No Subject
• Next by Date: Evaluation of a XML Database
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX 2.0 enhancement proposal
• Next by thread: Re: SAX 2.0 enhancement proposal
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread