• From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
• To: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:31:39 +0100

Tim Bray wrote:
> 
> 
> I'm sure there are some xsd: attributes you could use to say
> in a standardized way that this is base64, but <blush> I don't
> know it.  XSD gureaux?
> 
See http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-2-20010502/#base64Binary

> I'm always happy to avoid using CDATA sections if I can. -Tim
> 
A bit of a danger flag when they pop up on xsl-list... (Going back a two
or three years, I found that "Very interesting, but of course it won't
take off until it's got general browser support" was a classic
management "I don't get it" comment.)

Francis.

• References:
  • problems with datasection
    • From: "De Leon Pineda, Juan Ernesto" <JEDeLeon@s...>
  • RE: problems with datasection
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
• Next by Date: RE: problems with datasection
• Previous by thread: RE: problems with datasection
• Next by thread: Re: problems with datasection
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread