• From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• To: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 22:34:02 +0100

At 13:47 30/05/2001 -0700, you wrote:
> > For example,
> > you can imagine a schema langauge which advises people not to place an
> > element somewhere, and gives a "50%" no-no level.
>
>Hmmm... a Quantum Schema, with probabilistic types. I'll start work on a
>proposal...

You might be interested in Quantum Markup Language then:
         http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200004/msg00017.html

Sean

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: meta-specs
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>

• References:
  • RE: meta-specs
    • From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: meta-specs (was RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-sc hema)
• Next by Date: RE: meta-specs (was RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-sc hema)
• Previous by thread: RE: meta-specs
• Next by thread: Re: meta-specs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread