[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Bob DuCharme <bob@u...>
  • To: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>,"'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 20:03:25 -0400

> Does this mean that the [expletive deleted] architecture is competing for mindshare with
> the POO architecture?

Actually, I can not only say that I was right in there when the term POO was
coined; I've actually owned a Barbadosoft T-shirt (I'm on their advisory
board) for several months, and was wondering what the part about "take the
[expletive deleted] out" in small letters at the bottom meant. I'm sure that POO and [expletive deleted]
can all work together, and I'll do my best to avoid any scatalogical jokes.

>A classic battle over which will be number 1 and
> number 2.

ouch.

Bob DuCharme            www.snee.com/bob             <bob@
snee.com>      see http://www.snee.com/bob/xsltquickly for
info on upcoming "XSLT Quickly" from Manning Publications.



Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member