• From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• To: Martin Gudgin <marting@d...>,Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <kohsukekawaguchi@y...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 18:41:35 -0400

Martin Gudgin wrote:
> [MJG]
> The piece you are missing is that the default value of
> elementFormDefault is
> 'unqualified'
>

I didn't miss that. What I don't understand is how this value would be
_different_ for the "person" and "given" element decls given the definition
in the rec. i.e. none of the elements should be qualified. that's ok by me,
all I am saying is that they should all be in the same namespace (and I am
considering elements in no namespace to be in the 'same' namespace).

-Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
    • From: Martin Gudgin <marting@d...>
  • Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
    • From: Jeni Tennison <mail@j...>

• References:
  • Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
    • From: Martin Gudgin <marting@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
• Next by Date: Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
• Next by thread: Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread