Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 02/05/2001 23:29:50 Warren Hedley wrote:
>I'm wondering if anyone on the list has any strong opinions about
>the use of namespaces for versioning. In particular, am I likely
>to run into any problems if I base my namespaces on the Dublin Core
>format shown below?
I have a strong opinion that namespace URIs should be explicitly versioned. I'm
not against also having the version in an attribute value on the top-level
element, but I see that as a complement, not a replacement. The problem with
"canonical namespace URIs" that point to the most recent version of a spec is
that existing applications don't automatically rewrite themselves to fit the new
version of the spec. An application needs to be able to detect quickly whether
a document uses a version of a schema that it can deal with. If not, it then
needs to reject it, or pass it on to a different application, or get it
converted to a version that it can deal with. It is (needlessly) harder to get
this to work properly if the one namespace URI applies to all versions of a
schema.
Cheers,
Tony.
========
Anthony B. Coates
Leader of XML Architecture & Design
Chief Technology Office
Reuters Plc, London.
tony.coates@r...
========
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
|
