Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI wrote:
>
> Martin's example is correct. That's why I recommend (in my "XML Schema:
> DOs and DON'Ts") not to use local element declarations, or add
> elementFormDefault="qualified" to the <schema> element.
>
That has been pointed out and I now see. What initially surprised me what
that a 'top level' element decl would _default_ to the targetNamespace while
an element declared inside a complexType _defaults_ to no namespace.
As I've said before I can see either no namespaces e.g.
<person.name>
<given>Jimmie</given>
<family>Jones</family>
</person.name>
or use the same namespace for all elements in a related structure.
it is the mixing of qualified and unqualified elements that I find odd.
it is apparent that the designers of XML Schema felt otherwise, why else
would this be the default behavior (as in Martin's example)?
-Jonathan
|
