• From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• To: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 11:48:07 -0400

Sean McGrath wrote:
>
> [Jonathan Borden]
>
> >sure. what we still need is a processable incarnation of the "PSVI". no
such
> >thing exists today.
>
> Canonical Grove Representation.
>
> http://www.ornl.gov/sgml/wg8/docs/n1920/html/clause-A.4.5.html
>

as I said.

I didn't say that one couldn't _ever_ provide access to the PSVI (of course
one can do this), rather that the intended mechanisms to provide such access
(e.g. DOM Level foo etc.) are not yet defined/implemented.

-Jonathan

• References:
  • RE: Types and Context
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
  • Re: Types and Context
    • From: Jeni Tennison <mail@j...>
  • Re: Types and Context
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• Prev by Date: RDDL and types. Re: Types and Context
• Next by Date: RE: APIs, messaging
• Previous by thread: Re: Types and Context
• Next by thread: RE: Types and Context
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread