[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
The question[1] was not ridiculous ( at least I didn't think so... ). It was *trying* to point out that local scoping occurs even when you don't use unqualified elements! My point is that local scoping gets used anyway. It's confusing *to me* when I see two elements that *are* namespace qualified and yet have different meaning. Gudge [1] http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200105/msg00627.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI" <kohsukekawaguchi@y...> To: <xml-dev@l...> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 6:35 PM Subject: Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage? > > > > Then how do you distinguish between the two title elements? > > > > Context. > > Right.I wrote this question to illustrate how the original question of > Martin is ridiculous. > > > regards, > ---------------------- > K.Kawaguchi > E-Mail: kohsukekawaguchi@y... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS > <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > "unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@l...
|

Cart



