Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> But my point is that when you use attribute groups you *are* using local > attribute declarations. The attribute Right. But I want readers to understand that <attribute> is allowed only under an <attributeGroup>, just like DTD. People don't need to learn another way to do the same thing. One is enough. > the schema. It seems to me you are misleading your readers by claiming that > attribute declarations inside attribute groups are somehow different from > attribute declarations inside complex types when, in fact, they are not. I didn't write they are different. I didn't even mention that attributes can be written directly inside a complexType. As I said above, my intention is to make readers understand that <attribute>s are allowed only as children of <attributeGroup>. Because they don't need to learn complex types, it's a natural consequence, isn't it. That's why I proposed a solution that uses an attributeGroup for the problem I depicted. regards, ---------------------- K.Kawaguchi E-Mail: kohsukekawaguchi@y...
|
