• From: Eddie Robertsson <eddie@a...>
• To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@c...>
• Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 09:50:27 +1000

"Henry S. Thompson" wrote:

> Eddie Robertsson <eddie@a...> writes:
>
> <snip/>
>
> > It is strange though that your result from XSV says that validation
> > was STRICT.  In my opinion it should be LAX since it can't find the
> > declarations in the birthday schema.
>
> The XSV strict/lax report is wrt the document element, for which it
> _does_ have a type even in the absence of the birthday schema.

OK, that makes sense. However it would be good to get some sort of indication
that the XML document contained data that couldn't be validated. Maybe for a
future version?

Cheers,
/Eddie

• References:
  • RE: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
  • Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
    • From: Martin Gudgin <marting@d...>
  • Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
    • From: Martin Gudgin <marting@d...>
  • Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
    • From: Francis Norton <francis@r...>
  • Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
    • From: Eddie Robertsson <eddie@a...>
  • Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: Web Services stuff - fyi
• Next by Date: RE: meta-specs
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
• Next by thread: Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread