Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 30 May 2001 10:55:34 -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > I have before. We are staring into UML, RDF, Topic Maps, > XML Schemas, now add RDDL, TREX, RELAX, etc. It isn't that any tool > or method alone is hard to grasp, it is the relationships > among them and how to choose when one is best. In other > words, if we dare to do less, we should use less maybe. > > But put it altogether and I think interoperability becomes > a statistical guess. Too many casually aligned parts. RDDL does at least provide an opportunity to gather the rest of the parts and make their alignment explicit. For a nice example, see the RDDL spec itself: http://rddl.org How well the rest of the parts are actually aligned is up to their creators, of course.
|
