• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>,'Uche Ogbuji' <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 08:10:38 -0500

Yes.  Call it

C.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Lowery [mailto:jlowery@s...]

> The post-OO evolution at which I think you hinted is about flipping it
> all the way around so we're drafting neat functions to operate against
> the properly considered data models.

Ahhh, so I'm not insane; the pendulum swings don't it? The evolution
(revolution?) is acknowledged and underway. Have we yet come up with a
catchy name for this new paradigm? Ya gotta think through the marketing
angle, baby... glossy brochures and all.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Picking the Tools -- Marrying processing models to data model s
    • From: Joel Rees <rees@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Types and Context
• Next by Date: Re: Types and Context
• Previous by thread: Re: Picking the Tools -- Marrying processing models to data models
• Next by thread: Re: Picking the Tools -- Marrying processing models to data model s
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread