• From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>
• To: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
• Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:01:42 +0100 (BST)

On Wed, 23 May 2001, W. E. Perry wrote:

> process. Put differently, the data structure exhibited by an XML instance is
> still capable of sufficiently variable realization in process as to bridge the
> lack of shared data definition between the autonomous nodes of the internetwork
> topology.

Why's that different from any other way of transporting data? A comma
seperate values file is capable of realisation as a 2D array, an SQL-esque
table, a stream of data points logfile-style, a matrix in the mathematical
sense, a raster image, ...

> 
> Walter Perry
> 

ABS

-- 
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software  

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Picking the Tools -- Marrying processing models to data models
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• References:
  • Re: Picking the Tools -- Marrying processing models to data models
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML is _post_ OO
• Next by Date: RE: Picking the Tools -- Marrying processing models to data model s
• Previous by thread: Re: Picking the Tools -- Marrying processing models to data models
• Next by thread: Re: Picking the Tools -- Marrying processing models to data models
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread