• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 22:06:22 -0400

> Exactly. And if you stop to think about this, XML Schema "datatypes"  are
> hardly going to revolutionize XSLT/XPath 2.0.

Agreed. Again, from *my* perspective, it's all about interpretation.
You can flip an XSLT stylesheet and say that it is testing conformance 
to a set of assertions (schematron!), or in other words, it tests for,
and interprets, a type.

Seems obvious to me... an XSL stylesheet is a funky way of defining
a type-specific interpreter.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Types and Context
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>

• References:
  • Types and Context
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Indexing XML
• Next by Date: Re: Picking the Tools
• Previous by thread: Types and Context
• Next by thread: Re: Types and Context
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread