• From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• To: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>,Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 19:42:48 -0400

Uche,

> 
> The post-OO evolution at which I think you hinted is about flipping it
> all the way around so we're drafting neat functions to operate against
> the properly considered data models.
> 
> Data maintenance is a more important and more risky task than code
> maintenance.  A trememdous side-effect of XML adoption is that it's
> encouraging developers to finally start putting these matters in the
> right order.
> 

You got it man. Objects were sooo '90s.

-Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XML is _post_ OO
    • From: Linda Grimaldi <grimlinda@e...>

• References:
  • Re: Picking the Tools -- Marrying processing models to data model s
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
• Next by Date: Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
• Previous by thread: Re: Picking the Tools -- Marrying processing models to data model s
• Next by thread: RE: XML is _post_ OO
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread