• From: Eddie Robertsson <eddie@a...>
• To: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <kohsukekawaguchi@y...>
• Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:41:03 +1000

> I agree that your interpretation is natural and consistent by itself.
> But to my surprise, I believe that natural interpretation is not what the
> spec says.
>
> QName resolution rule, which is defined in the section 3.15.3, does not
> mention anything about chameleon capability. It says the resolution
> doesn't be affected by who includes the chameleon schema.
>
> But honestly I can't believe what I found. Is there anyone who can point
> to the specific section of the spec, and tell me that I'm wrong with
> this?

I can't help your there unfortunately. What I tried to explain was information
I gathered from discussions on this and the xml-schema mailing list (mainly
between Roger Costello and Henry Thompson). I haven't found anything that
support this in the spec, I just assumed (maybe incorrectly?) it was in there
somewhere.

Cheers,
/Eddie

• References:
  • ANN: XML Schema: DOs and DON'Ts
    • From: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <kohsukekawaguchi@y...>
  • Re: ANN: XML Schema: DOs and DON'Ts
    • From: Eddie Robertsson <eddie@a...>
  • Re: ANN: XML Schema: DOs and DON'Ts
    • From: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI <kohsukekawaguchi@y...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Attributes v Elements (adjectives vs. nouns)
• Next by Date: Re: ANN: XML Schema: DOs and DON'Ts
• Previous by thread: Re: ANN: XML Schema: DOs and DON'Ts
• Next by thread: RE: ANN: XML Schema: DOs and DON'Ts
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread