• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>, vdv@d...
• Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 15:41:38 -0700

At 10:51 AM 17/05/01 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
><p><span>This is no longer </span><i>mixed</i><span> content</span></p>

Yeah, but that [expletive deleted], doesn't it?

At one point I believe Charles Goldfarb suggested 

<p><>This is no longer </><i>mixed</i><> content</></p>

which [expletive deleted] a little less.  

Er, wouldn't you need either <span> or <> around the word
"mixed"? If not, why not? -T

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Attributes v Elements
    • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@a...>
  • Re: Attributes v Elements
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• References:
  • Attributes v Elements
    • From: "Conder, Tom D (N-MAXIM Group)" <tom.d.conder@l...>
  • Re: Attributes v Elements
    • From: Paul Cody Johnston <pcj@i...>
  • Re: Attributes v Elements
    • From: Duane Nickull <duane@x...>
  • Re: Attributes v Elements
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: Attributes v Elements
    • From: Duane Nickull <duane@x...>
  • Re: Attributes v Elements
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: Attributes v Elements
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RELAX Core has been approved. as ISO Technical Report
• Next by Date: RE: Attributes v Elements
• Previous by thread: Re: Attributes v Elements
• Next by thread: Re: Attributes v Elements
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread