[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: ANN: XML Schema: DOs and DON'Ts

• From: Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>
• To: 'Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI' <kohsukekawaguchi@y...>,Jeff Lowery <jlowery@s...>, Eddie Robertsson <eddie@a...>,xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 13:28:36 -0700

Oops, sorry. You're correct. Time for another eye exam...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI [mailto:kohsukekawaguchi@y...]
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 1:18 PM
> To: Jeff Lowery; Eddie Robertsson; xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re: ANN: XML Schema: DOs and DON'Ts
> 
> 
> 
> > > I understand that you can't believe what I said. But the 
> fact is, the
> > > spec explicitly prohibits this. If you have some time and plenty
> > > of patience, see the spec:
> > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#rcase-Recurse
> >  
> > Looking at this, I see rules for model groups, not 
> enumeration facets. I
> > don't believe enumerations facets are order-dependent, if 
> that's your point.
> > Restriction of enumerations is allowed, and such appears in 
> the Schema for
> > Schemas (Normative) section of the Recommendation. 
> 
> Maybe I'm missing something big, but when did we talk about 
> restriction
> of simple type by enumerations?
> 
> I think we are talking about restriction of <all> particle.
> 
> 
> regards,
> ----------------------
> K.Kawaguchi
> E-Mail: kohsukekawaguchi@y...
> 

• Prev by Date: Re: ANN: XML Schema: DOs and DON'Ts
• Next by Date: Re: ANN: XML Schema: DOs and DON'Ts
• Previous by thread: Re: ANN: XML Schema: DOs and DON'Ts
• Next by thread: RE: ANN: XML Schema: DOs and DON'Ts
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread