• From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>
• To: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@e...>
• Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 10:49:31 +0100 (BST)

On Mon, 21 May 2001, Jeff Rafter wrote:

> > I agree, (aside from the fact that urn:x2 is not a 'legal' URI)
> > http://example.org is defined by an RFC to be used as an example URI.
> 
> Sorry for perpetuating the bad URI.

urn:oid:1.2.826.1.4062548.2.0 is a valid URI, and is assigned to my mobile
phone :-)

I eagerly await a widely-implemented URN resolution protocol, but I think
it's now so late as to not be going to happen :-(

URN namespaces registry and references: 

http://RFC.net/Mirrors/ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/urn-namespaces

ABS

-- 
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software  

• References:
  • Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
    • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Attributes v Elements
• Next by Date: Re: Picking the Tools
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
• Next by thread: Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread