• From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@e...>
• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 08:48:16 -0700

> Implementation could mean validator, yes, though it's not limited that
way.
>
> Is your implementation partial, though?  Did you just support the features
> that made sense to you, or did you work all the way through the XML Schema
> spec to completion?

I suppose in some sense it is "partial" as I didn't need to use every
feature of XML Schema.  Obviously I would have no need for redefine
key/keyref or several others.  However it does fully represent my objects so
in that sense it is complete. I have gone through each version of the spec
to see if there were things I could add or needed to change-- I don't know
if that's what you mean by 'work all the way through the spec to completion'
but that's what I did...

If you want to see the result I have an online version:

http://xml.defined.net/cgi-bin/schemas.exe?class=TButton

Regards,
Jeff Rafter
Defined Systems
http://www.defined.net
XML Development and Developer Web Hosting

• References:
  • partial implementations of W3C XML Schema?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: partial implementations of W3C XML Schema?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: partial implementations of W3C XML Schema?
• Next by Date: Re: using namespaces to version
• Previous by thread: Re: partial implementations of W3C XML Schema?
• Next by thread: RE: partial implementations of W3C XML Schema?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread