• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 13:06:28 -0700

At 11:28 AM 18/05/01 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
>Some of my review comments for the namespace spec requested
>(repeatedly!) clarification on what XML processors need to do,
>but it wasn't forthcoming (over several spec iterations).  So it
>was clear to me that the relevant W3C folk didn't want to require
>XML processors to do anything.

It was just procedural; couldn't think of a way to
retroactively make this mod to XML 1.0 without opening the
let's-improve-XML can of worms. -Tim

• References:
  • Namespace conformance & SAX2
    • From: Chris Nokleberg <chris@s...>
  • Re: Namespace conformance & SAX2
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
• Next by Date: Re: Attributes v Elements
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespace conformance & SAX2
• Next by thread: Re: Namespace conformance & SAX2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread