[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Namespace conformance & SAX2

• From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• To: Rob Lugt <roblugt@e...>, Chris Nokleberg <chris@s...>,xml-dev@l...
• Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 17:58:38 -0400

Rob Lugt wrote:
>
> Therefore, it follows that when namespaces are enabled, any XML processor
> (whether SAX or not, validating or not) should report a fatal
> error when the
> QName or NCName productions are not matched.  This is because
> syntax errors
> are well-formedness errors and reporting well-formedness errors as fatal
> errors is in keeping with XML 1.0 [2].

no. use of colons does not alter the well formedness of an XML document.
Improper use of colons is a "Namespace Constraint" (see NSC in the NS rec).
Well formedness is an entirely XML 1.0 concept and no other document changes
that.

-Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Namespace conformance & SAX2
    • From: Rob Lugt <roblugt@e...>

• References:
  • Re: Namespace conformance & SAX2
    • From: Rob Lugt <roblugt@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
• Next by Date: Re: Namespace: what's the correct usage?
• Previous by thread: Re: Namespace conformance & SAX2
• Next by thread: Re: Namespace conformance & SAX2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread