• From: Ken North <ken_north@c...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 20:30:58 -0700

Jonathan Borden wrote:
> In particular statement [3] which defines Schema Equality as Instances(a)
= Instances(b), that is two schemata are 'equal' if their instance sets are
equal.
... snip ...

> I have not addressed the issue of how one might actually determine that
two schemata are functionally equal, but this is the general direction.

Hmmm... what about

1. types(a) = types(b)
2. PSVI(a) = PSVI(b)
3. validation errors(a) = validation errors(b)
4. Reverse engineer a and b into a conceptual model:
CM(a) = CM(b)

• References:
  • RE: meta-specs (was RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-sc hema)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: meta-specs (was RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-schema)
    • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@m...>
  • Re: meta-specs (was RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-schema)
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• Prev by Date: Move a section in XSL
• Next by Date: Re: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-schema
• Previous by thread: Re: meta-specs (was RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-schema)
• Next by thread: RE: meta-specs (was RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-sc hema)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread