Re: a or b or both - mystery..
I read Joe English's mail also. Let me ask you -- is there a definition of union of XML Schemas. I want to take union of 2 XML schemas, show me a way of doing it. For every operation, we should define how we can obtain the output type -- this is not needed unless your processing uses Schema. I am slightly sceptical that we will be able to define any meaningful union or other operations for XML Schemas. <warning>speaking for himself only</warning> cheers - murali. On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, Marcus Carr wrote: > > Murali Mani wrote: > > > I have asked professors and others -- everyone I have asked believes > > things just will not work without closure - you will get unexpected > > things. > > What things will not work and what unexpected things might you get? > > > I think if you use XML only for data exchange, then closure does > > not matter, but if you want to do actual processing, then I think closure > > is *very* important. > > What sort of processing? I have been involved with (perhaps a different form of?) SGML > and XML processing for ten years and I don't really even understand the problem...:-) > > > And it was a pleasure trying to explain whatever I know. I think everyone > > in this group tries to learn from the other. > > Absolutely - what you know still seems to be whizzing by me a bit, but I appreciate > your taking the time. > > > -- > Regards, > > Marcus Carr email: mrc@a... > ___________________________________________________________________ > Allette Systems (Australia) www: http://www.allette.com.au > ___________________________________________________________________ > "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." > - Einstein > > >
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format