[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Edd, No slight intended. I was simply trying to call people's attention to developerWorks because they are the "new kid on the block" with XML DevCon 2001 coverage -- something xml.com has done since the first conference in the series. -----Original Message----- From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...> To: xml-dev@l... <xml-dev@l...> Date: Friday, April 13, 2001 8:36 AM Subject: Don't forget me (was Re: Check developerWorks for XML DevCon 2001session reports and audio) > >On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 01:52:51PM -0700, Ken North wrote: >> After XTech in San Jose, David Megginson posted his post-conference >> thoughts. For persons who could not attend, Dave's wrapup report was >> useful. > >Hmm... far be it from me to push myself forward, but it's worth noting >that XML.com has given these things reasonable coverage too (our SJ >coverage is at <http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2000/11/22/devconwrap.html>). > >> Instead of posting the XML DevCon 2001 report here, I've provided the >> newsgroup link below. IBM developerWorks covered the conference and >> reporters covered individual sessions. developerWorks will also provide >> audio programs recorded during the week. > >I also noted my own, perhaps slightly more jaded, observations in "XML >Hype Down But Not Out In New York", at ><http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/04/11/xmldevcon.html>. > >-- Edd > >------------------------------------------------------------------ >The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS ><http://www.oasis-open.org> > >The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > >To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word >"unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@l...
|

Cart



