Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
From: Olivier Dubuisson [mailto:Olivier.Dubuisson@f...] >avoid reinventing the wheel Given the number of binary proposals and extant implementations, that can't be avoided. A WML developer would claim ASN.1 and a French telco are reinventing the wheel. A number of other companies probably are as well. >embedded devices, high-volume transactions, efficiency, compression ratio, No proof has been offered that the solutions for items one and two converge in the qualities of items three and four. Anecdotal evidence has been offered from developers that the time spent in parsing and the compression ratio gained does not warrant the effort. >careful design) that my company (with others) supports what is described at: That is not easy to quantify. ASN.1 exists and your company and unnamed parties support it. So far, that is the evidence offered. I have looked at the documents at the sites listed. So far, no quantitative evidence to support the claims is offered. I accept that there are those who assert the need for the standard XML binary. So far, that is easy to discern. No case has been made for any approach or requirements offered that would enable reasonable minds to choose among approaches offered. It is fine to take this offlist, but at some point XML-Dev list members might reasonably expect results of the discussions to be brought back for consideration. Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
|
