• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 12:51:39 -0500

The question is not is a binary useful for 
any given XML application language, but is a standard 
XML binary useful for all of them.  WML has one because 
it needs one and it is good for WML.  Generalizing that 
leads to false conclusions because the form and fit is 
not the same for the function.  

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Al B. Snell [mailto:alaric@a...]


On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Sean McGrath wrote:

> In my experience, when I run the figures, xml parsing does not
> feature highly in the performance hotspot data of my applications.

What kind of apps are you doing? It sounds like binary XML wouldn't be a
win *for you* :-)

But I expect you're not doing scientific computation or image processing!

• Prev by Date: RE: "Binary XML" proposals
• Next by Date: RE: "Binary XML" proposals
• Previous by thread: RE: "Binary XML" proposals
• Next by thread: RE: "Binary XML" proposals
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread