• From: Christian Nentwich <c.nentwich@c...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2001 16:06:32 +0100

> In fact, with a little will, both could be merged. For instance. an RDF
> expression refer to a particular resource by
> <mylink xlink:type="extended" etc...>
> <myresource xlink:type="locator" xlink:href=""http://www.talvastudio.com">
> .... a list of property elements about this resource ....
> </myresource>
> </mylink>

It is quite likely IMHO that links will always carry meta information in
the future, however I fail to see why you would want to lump the link
and metadata standards together..

They can be used together. That's good enough for me.

Christian

• References:
  • RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please
    • From: Didier PH Martin <martind@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please
• Next by Date: RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me und erstand, please
• Previous by thread: RE: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please
• Next by thread: Re: Linkbases, Topic Maps,and RDF Knowledge Bases -- help me understand, please
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread