• From: James Robertson <jamesr@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 13:17:49 +1000

At 12:02 2/04/2001, Wayne Steele wrote:

>I came across this bad link on the W3 site - shows you who's really running
>the place:
>
>http://search.w3.org%20public%20cgi-bin%20@00317.00056.00202.00071/us/SearchMS.asp?qu=RDF&boolean=ALL&i=00&i=02&i=04&i=06&i=08&i=01&i=03&i=05&i=07&i=09&p=1&nq=NEW

You do know that this is a link to
"00317.00056.00202.00071", not "search.w3.org"?

(It's a trick that seems to be appearing more
frequently in recent times...)

J

-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution

http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@s...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Evidence that the W3 is a Shill
    • From: Dan Diebolt <dandiebolt@y...>

• References:
  • Evidence that the W3 is a Shill
    • From: Wayne Steele <xmlmaster@h...>

• Prev by Date: Evidence that the W3 is a Shill
• Next by Date: Re: Evidence that the W3 is a Shill
• Previous by thread: Evidence that the W3 is a Shill
• Next by thread: Re: Evidence that the W3 is a Shill
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread