• From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:56:07 +0100

At 15:41 21/04/2001 -0300, Arved Sandstrom wrote:

>Overall point being, the assumption alluded to by Tim isn't just an
>assumption; that is, in fact, exactly how things are: dumb devices and slow
>connections. Maybe in 2005 things will be markedly different, but I'm not
>holding my breath. So, at present, and for years to come, WML works very
>nicely. I suppose I'm curious as to what the better alternative might be?

Download pixo (http://www.pixo.com) for a glimpse of a gateway free, WML
free road to the wireless web.

regards,
Sean

• References:
  • Blanket Statements about WAP
    • From: Arved Sandstrom <Arved_37@c...>

• Prev by Date: Sample for C++ schema validation using MSXML 4
• Next by Date: Announce: ElCel Technology release Canonical XML Processor 0.9
• Previous by thread: Blanket Statements about WAP
• Next by thread: Re: Blanket Statements about WAP
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread