[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • To: Ken MacLeod <ken@b...>, xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 14:57:20 -0500

From the RM3D specification: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rm3d

"While XML syntax is interesting as a descriptive syntax for RM3D, the goals
of this WG are firmly rooted in performance, media integration, and
commercial value."

That last root is an "in the eye of the beholden" issue.  In the end, the
"common" people 
get to choose among risks chosen for them.  This isn't a bad thing, but as
events are proving, 
it is a very real thing.   

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Ken MacLeod [mailto:ken@b...]

When different methods are available, then the common person will be able to
decide
which set of risks they choose to accept.  In any case, it is still in
everyone's best interest to identify risks and to foster effort to
reduce risk.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member