• From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>
• To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@c...>
• Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 15:27:03 +0100 (BST)

On 20 Apr 2001, Henry S. Thompson wrote:

> > Size otoh is not really a good argument. Gz-compressed SVG is really small
> > (smaller than the other vector graphic formats that I've benchmarked it
> > against),

Did you gzip them too, for a fair comparison?

The Binary Versus Text XML benchmarks I'm planning will include gzipped
and non-gzipped, and will involve the entire encoding / decoding path from
native data in C or Java or whatever to output bits...

> 
> ht
> 

ABS

-- 
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software  

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin@k...>

• References:
  • Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: RE: SVG paths in XSLT (was: Using W3C Regular Expressions)
• Next by Date: RE: SAX Filters
• Previous by thread: Re: SVG paths in XSLT (was: Using W3C Regular Expressions)
• Next by thread: Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread