[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>
  • To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:38:50 +0100 (BST)

On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Simon St.Laurent wrote:

> I'm thinking something like fragments, which may then have fragments, 
> etc.  Stays out of the metaphorical zone.

It's uniformly recursive, too, which means you never need to run out of
terms to describe smaller and smaller things :-)

ABS

-- 
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software  


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member