• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• To: "Box, Don" <dbox@d...>
• Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 22:10:57 +0100

"Box, Don" <dbox@d...> writes:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 9:48 AM
> > To: Simon St.Laurent; xml-dev@l...
> > Subject: Re: XML Schema 1.1
> > 
> > and personally I'd be
> > astounded to see anyone take on XML 1.1 in my lifetime; 
> 
> Especially since many consider XSD to be "XML 2.0" ;-)
> 
> In all seriousness, XSD makes the following three element instances
> identical:
> 
> <foo>200</foo>
> <foo>200.0</foo>
> <foo>200.0000000000000000</foo>
> 
> assuming the following element declaration is in scope:
> 
> <xsd:element name="foo" type="xsd:double" />

This is a slight exageration.  What is true is that XML Schema defines 
the 'actual value' of all three of those elements to be the same IEEE
double-precision floating point number.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

• References:
  • RE: XML Schema 1.1
    • From: "Box, Don" <dbox@d...>

• Prev by Date: XML spec dependencies chart --
• Next by Date: RE: Comments
• Previous by thread: RE: XML Schema 1.1
• Next by thread: XML data -> HTML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread