• From: Matt Sergeant <matt@s...>
• To: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>
• Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 12:06:17 +0100 (BST)

On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Steinar Bang wrote:

> >>>>> "Al B. Snell" <alaric@a...>:
> 
> > ...but if you're going to use TCP for RPCs, for God's sake don't use
> > port 80; that's for transferring hypertext. We have 65,000 or so
> > port numbers to choose from. If we use different port numbers for
> > different things, firewall administrators can make networks secure
> > by controlling what does and doesn't get let through.
> 
> Ah, but SOAP using port 80 is a _feature_, you know.  It allows SOAP
> to _tunnel_ through the firewall.

Some firewall administrators might call that "circumvention" :-)

-- 
<Matt/>

    /||    ** Founder and CTO  **  **   http://axkit.com/     **
   //||    **  AxKit.com Ltd   **  ** XML Application Serving **
  // ||    ** http://axkit.org **  ** XSLT, XPathScript, XSP  **
 // \\| // ** mod_perl news and resources: http://take23.org  **
     \\//
     //\\
    //  \\

• References:
  • Re: "Binary XML" proposals
    • From: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Next by Date: Re: Binary XML - summary of discussion to date
• Previous by thread: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Next by thread: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread