• From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>
• To: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...>
• Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:37:39 +0100 (BST)

On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Stephen D. Williams wrote:

> The only extensions I plan to suggest are layered on top of XML, just
> like all good XML compatible projects.  In particular, I need efficient
> and fine grained 'pointers' and delta overlay trees.
[...]
> One reason I sometimes refer to Binary Structured XML (bsXML  ;-)) as
> 'compressed' is to allude to the analogy of being able to 'uncompress'
[...]
> way to do versioned dictionary compression which makes sense for XML use
> in protocols.

Cool... wanna swap notes?

> 
> sdw
> 

ABS

-- 
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software  

• References:
  • Re: "Binary XML" proposals
    • From: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Next by Date: RE: "Binary XML" proposals
• Previous by thread: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Next by thread: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread