• From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>
• To: Danny Ayers <danny@p...>
• Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 10:35:17 +0100 (BST)

On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Danny Ayers wrote:

> If reducing bandwidth is the main requirement then I would have thought
> gzip-ing would be an ideal solution. Standard format, and the codec could be
> put inline fairly transparently (though didn't someone mention http 1.1
> supports compression itself????) :

That's a bit of a halfway house solution. It makes the on-the-wire format
smaller, but it increases the complexity at each end in terms of CPU time,
software complexity, and memory usage (especially during compression; gzip
uses sliding window, which is quite slow to compress, and the entropy
encoding is far from fast)

ABS

-- 
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software  

• References:
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals
    • From: Danny Ayers <danny@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Next by Date: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Previous by thread: RE: "Binary XML" proposals
• Next by thread: RE: "Binary XML" proposals
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread