Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
At 05:04 PM 4/20/01 +0200, Anders W. Tell wrote: >"Simon St.Laurent" wrote: >> >But what is the result after applying one or more reqexps, a xml fragment >> >or... ? >> >>That's what we need to figure out next. I'm leaning toward text fragments >>with labels - child text nodes with extra properties, in a DOM sense, or >>just extra information that a program could explore if needed. > >One simple solution may be to first annotate Schema with references to an >XSLT extension >and an equivalent Schema. Except that dealing with strings in XSLT is a huge pain in the neck. Thanks, I'll stick with regular expressions. >Then use this information to micro-parse nontrivial encodings using XSLT >into the equivalent XML fragment. No, thanks, that's all right. Way too much work for a result that's easy to get with simpler tools. I'm happy to consider bindings for micro-parsing, but I can't say I have any interest in promoting it as a primary tool for doing this work. Simon St.Laurent - Associate Editor, O'Reilly and Associates XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. XHTML: Migrating Toward XML http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
|
