• From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:15:17 -0700 (PDT)

On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> I think Henry is right similar to the way the Grove guys
> were right.

Where is Henry right?
I say that we almost always end up with non-deterministic content models
during document processing.
I also say that unique particle attribution as in XML Schema is *very*
exaggerated, if we need UPA (i doubt if we need it), we need UPA as
provided by unambiguous regular tree grammars.

regards - murali.

• References:
  • RE: Why XML Schema enforces UPA (was Re: a or b or both - mystery ..)
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Apparent contradiction in use of PEs inside internal entity defs
• Next by Date: RE: Using W3C Regular Expressions
• Previous by thread: RE: Why XML Schema enforces UPA (was Re: a or b or both - mystery ..)
• Next by thread: RE: Why XML Schema enforces UPA (was Re: a or b or both - mystery ..)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread