[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>
  • To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
  • Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 12:21:16 +0100 (BST)

On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Rick Jelliffe wrote:

> >...XML isn't good enough to realistically embed
> >binary objects inside it, so they have to go over a seperate connection
> >with some complex referencing mechanism.
> 
> Actually it seems like issues of how defaultable/compressible the data is,
> and how inheritence is handled, which  determine whether an XML document or
> a binary document is smaller. The specifics of how things are done seem to
> dominate theory-based expectations.

Default-handling could easily be handled in a binary format, too... I
mean, look at most image file formats!

> Rick Jelliffe

ABS

-- 
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software  


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member