• From: "Al B. Snell" <alaric@a...>
• To: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...>
• Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 12:58:55 +0100 (BST)

On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Stephen D. Williams wrote:

> > We use HTTP for RPCs, anyway? Being able to reuse Apache isn't a great
> > win. It's easy to listen on a port, perform some kind of authentication on
> > incoming connections, then just choose a scheme for delimiting requests
> > and an error-signalling system for use in response. Voila!
> 
> On the other hand, a common, shared, messaging queue would be more
> efficient in both network and server resources compared to anything else
> unless only a single message/response is needed.

A transactional message queue would be nice :-)

> 
> sdw
> 

ABS

-- 
                               Alaric B. Snell
 http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software  

• References:
  • Re: "Binary XML" proposals
    • From: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...>

• Prev by Date: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Next by Date: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Previous by thread: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Next by thread: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread