• From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:11:50 +0800

 :Al Snell:
:
:I'll make my point again:
:
:*It's a myth that binary formats are somehow harder to read than
:text-based formats.*

I have no doubt that anyone who has ever programmed in machine code (or even
assembler languages without symbolic addresses) would heartil disagree.
Where is Grace Hopper when we need her?

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: "Binary XML" proposals
    • From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>

• Prev by Date: Another binary XML approach
• Next by Date: RE: "Binary XML" proposals
• Previous by thread: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Next by thread: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread