[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: multiple schema proposed recs

• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 09:22:53 -0400

At 10:30 PM 4/2/01 -0700, Christopher R. Maden wrote:
>Did you read the status section?
>
>The deadline for review of this document is Monday 16 April 2001. [Note:
>this version of this Proposed Recommendation replaces that published on 16
>March 2001. The only change from that draft is that the type there called
>'number' is here renamed 'decimal'. This type was called 'decimal' up until
>the draft of 16 March 2001, so this change simply restores the original
>name of this type.]

No, actually, I hadn't.

Can't say I find those especially informative, especially regarding 
changes, around 97% of the time.  Since all three documents updated, I was 
expecting something more dramatic.

Republishing a Proposed Recommendation two weeks after its release to make 
a change like that feels like, well, an April Fools' joke.


Simon St.Laurent - Associate Editor, O'Reilly and Associates
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
XHTML: Migrating Toward XML
http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books

• References:
  • multiple schema proposed recs
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: multiple schema proposed recs
    • From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: another infoset vs. tree-model question
• Next by Date: Re: multiple schema proposed recs
• Previous by thread: Re: multiple schema proposed recs
• Next by thread: RE: multiple schema proposed recs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread