Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
I thought UDDI might be real usefull but I might be totally wrong here is that there isn't mechanism to traverse the list and select by context. Don't you need a schema reference to the list server that dictates this is my API. And UDDI basically tranforms into a not to clever data mapping server. I would much rather see a peer to peer method so that the AI guys can find a method data negotiation based on the context of business process ontologies. It would be dependent on the consise definition of individual process ontologies positioned correctly amongst a large collection of processes. Now I am just a dumb oakey but wouldn't the semantic part make it more accurate as it grows as a collection. -----Original Message----- From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...] Sent: 26 April 2001 01:13 To: xml-dev@l... Subject: Seeking lURNed advice on UDDI I'm beginning to think that UDDI might be real useful. If you check out the spec-ware (PDF, grrrrrrrrrr) at http://www.uddi.org/pubs/ProgrammersAPI-V1-1.pdf it turns out that the UDDI tagset is in a namespace whose name is "urn:uddi-org:api". This makes me uncomfortable, but maybe that's just because I don't understand URNs. First off, how unique is that? It doesn't *look* very unique to a URN virgin. Second, does this mean that you can't use RDDL or even an ordinary web page to allow the eager-to-learn to discover some things about the namespace? Or are have URN resolvers been quietly been springing up while I wasn't looking? (Neither IE nor Mozilla do anything useful for me with this particular URI). -Tim ------------------------------------------------------------------ The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@l...
|
