• From: Christian Nentwich <c.nentwich@c...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 11:27:05 +0100

> 
> Absent some good strong empirical evidence, neither processing
> nor storage cost are a priori arguments for going binary.

That's a very PC centric statement. Some platforms can't handle
compression algorithms or even parsing.

Christian

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: "Binary XML" proposals
    • From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>

• References:
  • RE: Images embedded in XML
    • From: "Al B. Snell" <alaric@a...>
  • "Binary XML" proposals
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Next by Date: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Previous by thread: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Next by thread: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread